<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Волга Ньюс &#8211; Lawyer in Samara</title>
	<atom:link href="https://advokatspitsyn.ru/en/tag/volga-njus-en/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://advokatspitsyn.ru/en/</link>
	<description>criminal and civil lawyers specialized website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2019 21:13:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Wrestlers with reptilians lost civil court</title>
		<link>https://advokatspitsyn.ru/en/borcy-s-reptiloidami-proigrali-grazhdanskij-sud/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 06:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oleg.Z]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[We are in the media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Волга Ньюс]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://advokatspitsyn.ru/?p=3268</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
								<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid"><div class="wpb_column vc_column_container vc_col-sm-12"><div class="vc_column-inner"><div class="wpb_wrapper">
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element " >
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p><strong> On Wednesday, September 13, the Samara Regional Court considered the appeal in the case of Marina Gerasimova v. Evgenia Grakhova.<br />
Recall the first tried to recover from the second debt of 900 thousand rubles. </strong></p>
<p>The situation was complicated by the fact that Marina Gerasimova was actually the right hand of Svetlana Lada-Rus (Peunova), who once said that the planet Earth was threatened by reptiles from the planet Nibiru. The power of the woman’s conviction was so great that many people gathered around her who believed in the healing power of her speeches. This is how the Academy of Development of Svetlana Peunova and the party Volya emerged, from which she was nominated both to the governors of the Samara region and to the presidency of the Russian Federation.</p>
<p>However, the Volia party was recently recognized as extremist and officially banned, and Lada-Rus (Peunova) itself, along with its associate Marina Gerasimova, became the defendants of the criminal case, according to which not all followers of the “healer” acted voluntarily, and some, according to consequences, even received psychological trauma.</p>
<p>One of the episodes of the criminal case concerns Evgenia Grakhova: it is supposed that she was forced to rewrite her foreign car in the name of Marina Gerasimova after she wanted to get rid of Svetlana Lada-Rus (Peunova). In order to refute this, Gerasimova appealed to the Novokuibyshevskiy city court with a civil suit against Grakhova, to whom she attached a receipt of the last, which stated a debt of 900 thousand rubles.</p>
<p>However, Grakhova was able to prove that there was no transfer of funds, and therefore the loan was found to be cashless, and the contract between Gerasimova and Grakhova was not concluded.</p>
<p>On September 13, according to the lawyer Grakhova, <strong> Leonid Spitsyn &lt;/ strong&gt;, the Samara Regional Court, after hearing once again the arguments of the parties, left the decision of the Novokuibyshevskiy City Court unchanged.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: right;"><em> <strong> Source: </strong> </em><br />
<em> Volga News Information Portal </em><br />
<em> <a href="http://volga.news/article/450443.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"> http://volga.news/article/450443.html</a> </em><br />
<em> 09/13/2017 </em></p>

		</div>
	</div>
</div></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
										</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evgenia Grakhova filed a counterclaim to the “right hand” of Svetlana Lada-Rus</title>
		<link>https://advokatspitsyn.ru/en/evgeniya-grahova-podala-vstrechnyj-isk-k-pravoj-ruke-svetlany-lada-rus/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 06:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oleg.Z]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[We are in the media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Волга Ньюс]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://advokatspitsyn.ru/?p=3269</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
								<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid"><div class="wpb_column vc_column_container vc_col-sm-12"><div class="vc_column-inner"><div class="wpb_wrapper">
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element " >
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p><strong> The Novokuibyshevskiy District Court decides whether there was a debt of 900 thousand rubles, due to which in 2016 the criminal prosecution of the “right hand” of Svetlana Lada-Rus &#8211; Marina Gerasimova began. </strong></p>
<p>Recall, according to investigators, Gerasimov committed a fraud, taking a car from her ex-colleague Yevgenia Grakhova in respect of non-existent debt.</p>
<p>To prove the contrary, Gerasimova filed a civil suit against Grakhova, demanding to pay her 900 thousand rubles, which she borrowed in 2015.</p>
<p>“The plaintiff cannot even remember exactly when she allegedly gave money, naming only an approximate date &#8211; January 2015. And this is logical, because Grakhova didn’t actually take any money,” said her lawyer Leonid Spitsyn. was written much later &#8211; in November 2015, and it was forced to do it with the help of threats. &#8221;</p>
<p>In the materials of the criminal case against Gerasimova, which will be considered on May 29 in the Neftegorsky District Court, there is some kind of expertise confirming that at the time of signing the document the author of the signature was, as they say, &#8220;not in himself.&#8221;</p>
<p>“On October 29, I came to Barinovka to tell Peunova that I’m quitting, and she told me that I owed her everything good that happened in my life,” Yevgeny Grakhova recalls. “I left there only after signing all the necessary documents for Gerasimova, and it was already November 5 &#8220;.</p>
<p>However, the plaintiff has a different version of what happened.</p>
<p>“Gerasimova and Grakhova were friends for a long time, they worked at Peunova for about the same positions, and when one asked for a loan, the other gave them calmly,” said lawyer Galina Kulagina. “Then Grakhova got ready to leave and offered to write this receipt so that” not to lose face &#8220;in front of a friend. She later offered to pick up her car to pay the debt. Gerasimova agreed, and a power of attorney was issued for her, for which the car was subsequently sold. After that, Grakhova wrote a statement to the police.&#8221;</p>
<p>According to the second lawyer Marina Gerasimova, Konstantin Eliseev, they have on hand the results of another examination, which state that the woman who signed under the receipt was not at all in the heat of passion. In general, the plaintiff has already ensured the appearance of two witnesses in court (who were still not interrogated).</p>
<p>For the first time a civil suit against Grakhova Gerasimov, according to <strong> lawyer Spitsyna &lt;/ strong&gt;, filed back in 2016, when a criminal case was just beginning to recognize civil relations and escape from criminal responsibility under the article &#8220;fraud&#8221; . Then the court of first instance even ruled in absentia in favor of the plaintiff, but the Samara Regional Court canceled it and sent the case for review, because Grakhova was not present at the sessions. After that, the consideration of a civil case was suspended until the end of the investigation of the criminal case against Gerasimova. After he was taken to court, civil litigation resumed.</strong></p>
<p>Interestingly, if the Novokuibyshevsky City Court acknowledges that the fact of the transfer of money was, then the criminal case will be “shaken”, because then the fact of fraud will be unprovable.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Evgenia Grakhova filed a counterclaim against Marina Gerasimova, in which she asks to recognize the transaction to receive her money as invalid, since there was no actual transfer of money, plus at that time she was not aware of what was happening.</p>
<p>Whose side will take the court &#8211; a big question.</p>
<p style="text-align: right;"><em> <strong> Source: </strong> </em><br />
<em> Volga News Information Portal </em><br />
<em> <a href="http://volga.news/article/441804.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"> http://volga.news/article/441804.html</a> </em><br />
<em> 05.26.2017 </em></p>

		</div>
	</div>
</div></div></div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
										</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
